Jenileigh wrote:
We can discuss it more later because that doesn't make a lot of sense to me. My experience is basically Baptist-Pastor-deacons-then secretary, treasurer ect. Monthly/Quarterly meetings. Discussions voting on decisions, raising, whos paid whos not, building funds ect.
This is similar to what you'd see in a parish, with a little variance.
Jenileigh wrote:
Then onto a Non-Denominational church where there is a Bishop/Pastor, he has an armor bearer, there are care pastors available to the congregation but basically the Bishop makes all decisions. There are no deacons and they preach against them. There really aren't any meetings to discuss where monies go. He appeases the congregation for small decisions sometimes but not all the time and it's nothing for him to address the church body that he is changing the name of the church without a vote. We never got to see where the money was going. We are assured that the church has a mother church that it tithes to. It's a member of the Church of God but claims not to be a church of God. Most ministry is done within the 4 walls of the church.
This does not sound healthy (or biblical). But truth be told, I know an Orthodox parish that's functioning with a priest a bit like this, too. The people don't have much knowledge/say but are assured everything is fine. I'm pretty sure it will come to a head, though, and be dealt with. There are no lone churches in Orthodoxy. All parishes have bishops over them and sister parishes within their jurisdiction (and really, around the world -- we're all one).
Jenileigh wrote:
We've been to other churches. Believe in speaking in tongues, have experienced many of the gifts, witnessed miracles and healings, demonic possessions and deliverances and lots more in between.
We believe in all this, too, and as you read the lives of the saints throughout history, you see amazing miracles testified to. Did you know that when Mary, Jesus' mother, died, all the living apostles came to where she was for her funeral? And I don't mean on foot -- they all miraculously appeared. There are words of knowledge, healings, deliverance, etc. all in Orthodoxy. Maybe not in a spontaneous way during services like you're used to (as we were), because the design and purpose of our liturgy is different from that, but they're there a part of our faith all the same.
Jenileigh wrote:
I became enthralled about the Orthodox church when Darla first began looking into it. I read the book she recommended that sort of guided or led them into the Orthodox but it didn't answer a lot for me. Forgive me but I've loaned it out and can't recall the name although I know Darla will know it.
Was it
Becoming Orthodox by Fr. Peter Gillquist, the story of how seven former Campus Crusade leaders led about 2000 people into converting at once in the 1970s-1980s? That's the one coming to mind. I can think of a couple more to recommend (and Anna's recommendation of
The Orthodox Church by Bshp. Kallistos Ware is a good one, too). One is
Common Ground: An Introduction to Eastern Christianity for the American Christian by Jordan Bajis and the other is
Light From the Christian East: An Introduction to the Orthodox Tradition by James Payton (who is not Orthodox, so he's not trying to convince anyone of anything, just showing from a historical and theological perspective what our Tradition is all about). For a more warm, story-like telling of a conversion, I highly recommend
Facing East by Frederica Mathews-Green.
Jenileigh wrote:
As I've spoken to my husband about "trying" it out he does not feel led that way because he says we are free to worship Christ as we feel led and that we are no longer to be bound by the legalities of how things were. He feels it's too ritualistic and too Catholic.
Coming from the same background, I
do understand his thoughts on this! And it's important to honor him as your husband, too. Hugs to you. I think, though, that once one takes a good hard look at what the early church
actually looked like, and not what we
think it looked like, it's hard to call it "too catholic" (we'd say "too orthodox"
), because it's the way the church was functioning immediately after Pentecost and moving on from there. It's how the Jewish people worshiped (and still do), and it's what worship is like in heaven -- it seems more natural that it would be the same during this interim, too, rather than very different from what came before and what lies ahead.
Do you know why I personally like our "ritual" (things like crossing ourselves, having the priest cense the icons on the wall, having a set service with specific wording, etc.)? Because it ties us to those early believers, and those throughout history, and gives a depth to the faith that I really
need. I know that from the humble, simple saint who is my patron saint (a 16th century Russian homemaker) to the man who wrote the Divine Liturgy 1600 years ago, all eastern Christians did/do these things for the same reasons. And the Eucharist I will receive tomorrow, Lord willing, is the same as they received back then. What a unity across time!
For more on this, I recommend reading the Didache and other early church writings (people who were there). The Didache can be found online. A summary and exposition of this topic can be found in the book
Orthodox Worship: A Living Continuity With the Temple, the Synagogue and the Early Church. This books shows how the Church after Pentecost had liturgy, the Eucharist as the Body and Blood of Christ (not a memorial/symbol), written prayers prayed at certain times, bishops/priests, incense, etc.
Going to some services and seeing the piety/reverence and honor shown to God in a deep, faith-filled way, and with God-honoring practices, is another something that will go a long way in seeing why the original church worshipped this way. Please do let your husband know, Jenileigh, that we are not Roman Catholic. I think there can be misunderstanding with that -- some think of the Orthodox church as an ethnic Catholic church (I used to), but we've not been in communion with the Catholic church for 1000 years because of the issues that came to a breaking point back then, which resulted in them leaving communion with all the other bishops of Christianity. We hope for reunion! But they would have to give up the supremacy of the papacy (and have him became first among equals again) and it's not likely that will be happening any time soon.
Jenileigh wrote:
This is why I was interested in how the Orthodox church was ran. I seen Darla mention deacons and it peeked my curiosity. I'm just trying to grasp it the concept.
May you have a beautiful Lord's day tomorrow with your family, Jenileigh. I've known you for a long time, and I know your desire for the things of God is
strong.